Laboratory for Chemistry and Life Science Institute of Innovative Research TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY



Latest Research

  • 2017.04.03
  • Nakamura-Okada Group

HRP-Catalyzed Tyrosine Click Reaction with Luminol Derivatives

The chemical modification of proteins with synthetic probes is an important technique in chemical biology. It is one of the essential tools for the development of protein-based therapy and protein imaging technology.

N-Hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) esters and maleimide are widely used for the modification of lysine and cysteine residues, respectively. In addition to conventional modification methods that target nucleophilic amino acid residues, alternative methods that can modify other amino acid residues, such as tyrosine or tryptophan residues, have attracted immense attention recently.

With regard to tyrosine modification strategies, several reactions that proceed in an aqueous environment have been reported. However, few exhibit tyrosine specificity and good modification efficiency, and an efficient tyrosine-specific peptide/protein modification method is desired.

HRP has been used previously for tyrosine modification reactions; examples include tyrosine-tyrosine cross-coupling,1-3 and coupling between tyrosine residues and tyramide (Scheme 1A). It is utilized for tyramide signal amplification (TSA), which involves the covalent deposition of a fluorophore-tyramide conjugate around a HRP-conjugated secondary antibody, resulting in localized fluorescent signal enhancement.4,5 Although HRP-catalyzed protein modification based on tyramide is expected to have wide-ranging biological applications, the problem faced by current technologies is the low protein labeling efficiency.6 There is an obvious need to develop efficient peroxidase-catalyzed protein labeling technologies to overcome the limitations of HRP-based protein imaging. Recentlhy, we found that horseradish peroxidase (HRP) effectively catalyzes the oxidative activation of luminol derivatives and induces tyrosine-specific modification with high efficiency7 (Scheme 1B).


Figure 1. Concept of this work: A) tyramide method, B) this work. Tyrosine modification by using N-methyl luminol derivatives and HRP.

The efficiencies of tyrosine modifications were determined by LC-MS analysis. Under the reaction conditions, with HRP and H2O2, the efficiency of labeling with tyramide was low because of a side reaction, involving an oxidative tyramide radical process (Figure 2 A). In contrast, efficient modification was achieved when N-methyl luminol derivative, 0.1 mol% HRP and 1.0 equiv H2O2 were used. Neither tyrosine-tyrosine crosslinked product nor byproduct derived from tyrosine was detected under these reaction conditions (Figure 2 B).


Figure 2. Efficiency of tyrosine modification catalyzed by HRP. Tyrosine modification of with tyramide and N-methyl luminol derivative.

We compared the protein modification efficiencies of the N-methyl luminol derivative and of tyramide. In the reaction that used Cy3-conjugated probes, HRP, H2O2, and bovine serum albumin (BSA) (0.1-10 µm), the Cy3-conjugated N-methyl luminol derivative showed much higher modification efficiency than the Cy3-tyramide. According to the results shown in Figure 3B, the Cy3-conjugated N-methyl luminol modified BSA even at a low concentration, and the detection limit of BSA with N-methyl luminol was less than 0.5 pmol, whereas that with tyramide was about 5 pmol.


Figure 3. BSA modification with Cy3-conjugated N-methyl luminol derivative and Cy3-tyramide.

N-methyl luminol derivatives showed much higher efficiency than tyramide without inducing oligomerization of probe molecules. The use of HRP, a widely employed reporter molecule in biological research, in the current method is expected to open doors to such biological applications as signal amplification of HRP-conjugated antibodies, local labeling around peroxidase-tagged molecules, and protein-protein complex analysis in combination with peroxidase-tag technology.


1A. J. Gross, I. W. Sizer, J. Biol. Chem. 1959, 234, 1611-1614.
2K. Minamihata, M. Goto, N. Kamiya, Biotech. J. 2015, 10, 222-226.
3K. Minamihata, M. Goto, N. Kamiya, Bioconjug. Chem. 2011, 22, 74-81.
4R. P. van Gijlswijk, H. J. Zijlmans, J. Wiegant, M. N. Bobrow, T. J. Erickson, K. E. Adler, H. J. Tanke, A. K. Raap, J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1997, 45, 375-382.
5L. Yuan, L. Xu, S. Liu, Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 10737-10744.
6H. W. Rhee, P. Zou, N. D. Udeshi, J. D. Martell, V. K. Mootha, S. A. Carr, A. Y. Ting, Science 2013, 339, 1328-1331.
7S. Sato, K. Nakamura, H. Nakamura, Chembochem 2017, 18, 475-478.